Search for: "Peckham v. Peckham"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division dismissed Retiree's Article 78 petition.Citing Matter of Peckham v Calogero, 12 NY3d 424, the Appellate Division ruled that the Authority's denial of Retiree's request was not arbitrary and capricious as:1. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
” Malphurs gives one example I had not known about: Infamously, Jay Floyd in Roe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
” Malphurs gives one example I had not known about: Infamously, Jay Floyd in Roe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
" Significantly, the Appellate Division noted that the Petitioner had pled guilty to the offending acts and thus they were more than accusations.Citing Peckham v Calogero, 12 NY3d 424, the Appellate Division concluding that the denial of Petitioner's request for reinstatement to his position was not arbitrary and capricious as, under the governing regulations,** the appointing authority "may consider such [an] application but is not required to do so, and any… [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 1:27 pm
" Significantly, the Appellate Division noted that the Petitioner had pled guilty to the offending acts and thus they were more than accusations.Citing Peckham v Calogero, 12 NY3d 424, the Appellate Division concluding that the denial of Petitioner's request for reinstatement to his employment was not arbitrary and capricious as under the governing regulations** the appointing authority "may consider such application but is not required to do so, and any approval… [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 1:27 pm
" Significantly, the Appellate Division noted that the Petitioner had pled guilty to the offending acts and thus they were more than accusations.Citing Peckham v Calogero, 12 NY3d 424, the Appellate Division concluding that the denial of Petitioner's request for reinstatement to his employment was not arbitrary and capricious as under the governing regulations** the appointing authority "may consider such application but is not required to do so, and any approval… [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
" Significantly, the Appellate Division noted that the Petitioner had pled guilty to the offending acts and thus they were more than accusations.Citing Peckham v Calogero, 12 NY3d 424, the Appellate Division concluding that the denial of Petitioner's request for reinstatement to his position was not arbitrary and capricious as, under the governing regulations,** the appointing authority "may consider such [an] application but is not required to do so, and any… [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court granted both petitions thereby annulling the Chief’s determinations and the Town appealed.The Appellate Division said that a determination denying an application for General Municipal Law §207-c benefits may be annulled only if it was arbitrary and capricious, and "An action is arbitrary and capricious when it is taken without sound basis in reason or regard to the facts," citing Peckham V Calogero, 12 NY3d 424.The court explained that "a… [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 5:15 am
“An action is arbitrary and capricious when it is taken without sound basis in reason or regard to the facts” (Peckham v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 5:15 am
“An action is arbitrary and capricious when it is taken without sound basis in reason or regard to the facts” (Peckham v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:33 am
Lochner v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:20 am
Secretary of Stage for the Environment, transport and regions v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
It is helpful to read Jacobson alongside the more famous public health case the Court decided two months later: Lochner v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Copcutt v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:22 am
She went to the Peckham one stop shop where she was advised to go to the Southwark HPU. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:52 pm
West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 3:01 pm
On the other hand, if the positions that he staked out and defended eventually are regarded as reactionary or unjust from the standpoint of the future, Rehnquist will be regarded like Justice Peckham, who wrote Lochner v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:39 am
Seaport Park v Greater N.Y. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
demolition defined It just so happens there is no definition of the word "demolition" in either the RSC or ETPR, and that omission came to the forefront in the case of Peckham v. [read post]
