Search for: "Pedersen v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Second, the federal RFRA is unconstitutional when applied to state law under Boerne v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 3:14 am
This paper assesses the current state of play in respect to the precautionary principle and its status in international law. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 8:50 am by Jake McGowan
Pedersen Consumer Reviews at “Local” Review Sites Don’t Support Jurisdiction–Wilkerson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Office of Personnel Management (appeals court applying rational basis test only) Pedersen v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Office of Personnel Management (appeals court applying rational basis test only) Pedersen v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:45 pm by Lyle Denniston
  (The New England case is Pedersen v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Briefly: The Advocate and JURIST have further coverage of the petition for certiorari filed in Pedersen v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:24 am by Cormac Early
 Justin Snow of Metro Weekly and the Associated Press (via the Boston Globe) report on the cert. petition (which Conor also covered in yesterday’s round-up ) in Pedersen v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 4:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The new petition and appendix were filed in Pedersen v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:08 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Supreme Court to Hear Pedersen DOMA Challenge Today, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) asked the Supreme Court to review Pedersen v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:06 pm by Russell Powell
In the latest of a series of decisions striking down DOMA, today in Pedersen v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:50 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
This just in …  GLAD, the legal team representing the Plaintiffs in the Pedersen v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:56 pm by Jamie Reese
[JURIST] United States District Court for the District of Connecticut [official website] on Wednesday denied a motion to stay [order] in Pedersen v. [read post]