Search for: "Penn Central Company, Appeal of" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board may construe claims in an issued patent according to their broadest reasonable interpretation rather than their plain and ordinary meaning; and (2) whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, even if the Board exceeds its statutory authority in instituting an IPR proceeding, the Board’s decision whether to institute an IPR proceeding… [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am by NCC Staff
In 1978, Justice William Brennan wrote for a 6-3 majority in the Penn Central v. [read post]
After the trial, the jury decided that there was an unconstitutional regulatory taking of the plaintiff’s property pursuant to Lucas and Penn Central. [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:47 am by Kristian Soltes
This patent applies to digital dollars as well as other central bank digital currencies such as pounds, yen, and euros and so the physical currency of a central bank anywhere in the world could be digitized. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:36 am
I found a news story that noted, not surprisingly, that Voneida is going to appeal the conviction.I have to assume the central issue in an appeal will be the Alkhabaz issue: whether or not posting what he posted on MySpace is really a threat (a "true threat") or something else. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:27 am by Rizzo, Christopher
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that various states could assert public nuisance claims against energy companies. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Peter Margulies
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued decisions that cast substantial doubt on the legality of two Trump administration rules on asylum. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
At issue was whether the district court erred in using the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
The company’s alleged wrongdoing crossed a “moral line,” Premier Li Keqiang said. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:53 pm
City and County of San Francisco held that even though a property owner is deprived of the most profitable use of the land, "land use restrictions reasonably related to the promotion of the health, safety, morals, or general welfare" are not regulatory takings requiring compensation. [14]  The means for predicting the outcomes of these cases appear to rest in weighing traditional takings analysis factors, including whether the property has lost all economically viable uses and whether… [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
  The phrase had nothing to do with the test for the statute of limitations but was used to demonstrate that a defendant had adequate notice of financial problems at Penn Central at the time it conducted a credit investigation of the failed financial institution. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 20 May 2024, the court granted permission to appeal over the freedom of speech and nationality points. [read post]