Search for: "Penn Construction Inc" Results 21 - 40 of 107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
A similar scheme happened at Axor Experts-Conseils Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Supreme Court granted review in this CEQA-related regulatory taking case was granted on December 19, 2018, and will essentially address whether the Landgate “substantially advances” test was abrogated and supplanted by the Penn Central test in California after the U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
It is my great pleasure to pass along the announcement of the publication of Joel Slawotsky's excellent article: "The National Security Exception in US-China FDI and Trade: Lessons from Delaware Corporate Law" which appears in the The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 6(2):228–264.In this new era defined by the re-creation of global regional economic blocks--one centered in China, and the other in the United States, the issue of national interest in the areas where the two… [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:01 am
Special thanks to my research assistant Angelo Mancini (Penn State Law expected 2017) for his usual excellent work. [2] Joseph Stiglitz, Globalization and Its Discontents (Penguin Books 2002); Thomas L. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 8:48 am by John Smolen
The rest of the PLTP construction team includes The Lane Construction Corporation, Traylor Bros., Inc., and lead designer Atkins North America, Inc., CAF USA, Inc. which will supply light rail vehicles, and the operations and maintenance team of Alternate Concepts, Inc. and CAF USA, Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am by Patricia Salkin
After setting forth its purposes, the ordinance set out a number of options for developments subject to its provisions to meet the need for affordable housing, including the 15% requirement, or to raise that requirement to 20% if such units are constructed offsite, payment of an “in lieu” fee, dedicating land with an equivalent value to the applicable “in lieu” fee, or acquiring and rehabilitating existing substandard housing. [read post]