Search for: "People v Ackerman"
Results 21 - 40
of 182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2022, 7:59 am
See Ackerman v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
We have become Court-centric, “lost our ability to write,” in Bruce Ackerman’s phrasing. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
To my surprise, although a few people had written about it, see, e.g., Kenneth Duval, Burdens of Proof and Qualified Immunity, 37 S. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
Rose-Ackerman’s view at times seems superficially closer to the majority view expressed by the Supreme Court in INS v Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, which found that a legislative veto over an agency decision was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Yes, the Article V process leading to those Amendments was in some respects procedurally irregular, as Bruce Ackerman has shown. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
And, for that matter, if the Republicans controlled the Senate, and Ted Cruz were President pro tem, would not some people be skeptical about his presiding over Trump’s trial, given the very real possibility that he, like Democrats, could be a Trump rival for the White House in 2024 if Trump is not disqualified after an impeachment conviction? [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am
That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 12:23 pm
National Rifle Ass’n v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
He views Justice Marshall, in the 1803 Marbury v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
After all, in the wake of the Civil War the people who were most determined to assert legal continuity were former Confederates, not radical Republicans. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm
Connecticut and particularly since Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
Popular Constitutionalism and Bruce Ackerman’s theory of “constitutional moments” are examples of this approach. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
Davis’s trial ends because he receives a pardon; the Supreme Court eventually takes Lincoln’s side of the debate in Texas v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Bruce Ackerman and others have suggested that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments may not have met Article V’s requirements, but attained legitimacy through other means.Similarly, it may mean that the Nineteenth Amendment and the Equal Rights Amendment can be legitimized through means other than Article V. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 7:52 pm
” United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
In Marbury v. [read post]
