Search for: "People v Schulz"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the latest news in Trump v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
”); People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am
Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast in which he sat down with Tatyana Bolton, Jamil Jaffer, and Megan Stifel to discuss the first Cyber Safety Review Board Report and other recent cybersecurity law developments: Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Evelyn Douek and Jurecic sat down with Evan Greer to discuss the role of Section 230 protections on liability for speech about abortion post-Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm
David Wolfe, chairman of the Press Recognition Panel, said “urgent action is needed to ensure people who are wronged get access to justice”.Mr Wolfe said “it seems the press has not learned from the past and urgent action is needed to ensure people who are wronged get access to justice”. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
IPKat has a post on the China’s image rights and the threshold for protection of the right to likeness following the publication of the nine “Typical civil cases of judicial protection of personality rights after the promulgation of the Civil Code of China” from the Supreme People’s Court of China. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:06 pm
Bill Schulz, a prominent trial lawyer and spokesman for the American Association of Justice, had this to say about Pearson v Chung: “[Pearson] should not be used as an indictment against the civil justice system in this country because it works quite well, thank you, for people — ordinary people — who are seeking real justice for real cases of negligence and wrongdoing. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 11:26 am
Matthew Tokson analyzed federal and state judgments applying Carpenter v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Pascale v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Pascale v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
ITC judge didn't buy testimony for which Qualcomm paid a single expert $3-4 million in Apple dispute
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
I'll talk about the public-interest analysis again soon (from an antitrust angle), but for now I'd just like to show you (a) the initial determination and, below that one, (b) the ITC's call for public-interest statements (which are due by November 8; by coincidence, that's also the date of the next Qualcomm v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:59 am
Bell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
(2) Nike v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm
” In Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
However, there are a number of downsides to litigation that pose real problems for the art world: (1) court proceedings are public forums that offer little confidentiality for litigants seeking to protect their reputation; (2) art-related disputes are often internationalized – requiring parties to bring claims in foreign, unfamiliar jurisdictions; (3) court remedies may fail to satisfy non-conventional stakeholders — such as Indigenous peoples — who may seek the return of… [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:16 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Roberts v Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association considered this issue in the context of the common law choice of law rules. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
