Search for: "People v. Appellate Department (1996)" Results 21 - 40 of 187
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am by Emily Coward
Appellate courts in Louisiana affirmed the conviction, relying on Apodaca v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Order modified in accordance with the opinion herein and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for consideration of the facts (CPL 470.25 [2] [d]; 470.40 [2] [b]) and, as so modified, affirmed. -------- Notes: 1. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
The appellant, a barrister and founding member of the Liberal Democrats, sought an order against the respondents requiring them to identify the identities of people who had made anonymous complaints against her to the political party. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:46 am by Nathan
(Decision and Order, Sept. 17, 2008 at 67.) -=-=-=-=- And it’s just a slap in the face for the Appellate Division to cite to People v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Assoc., 218 AD2d 43, 44 [1996]; Coronet Capital Co. v Spodek, 202 AD2d 20, 26-27 [1994]; People v Abbott Manor Nursing Home, 112 AD2d 40, 41 [1985]), and we read the statute here as contemplating that the commission paid to a receiver will be the statutory percentage of the amount that has been both collected and disbursed. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
OF JUST., DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE’S REVIEW OF SECTION 230 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT OF 1996 (2020). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by MBettman
” The majority departs from this position in this case, and also departs from the appeals court on this point. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 9:57 pm
In a letter to counsel, the Department took the position that pursuant to the decision of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in Matter of Muntaqim v Herbert, the "relationship between such sentences had to remain consecutive. [read post]