Search for: "People v. Cobb"
Results 21 - 40
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2017, 3:30 am
Anyway, here’s how the court in Cobb v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 3:30 am
Anyway, here’s how the court in Cobb v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
Steeves, 525 F.2d 33, 38 (8th Cir. 1975) (upholding a warrant on the basis that "people who own pistols generally keep them at home or on their persons"); United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:32 am
The case of Joshua Martin v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:29 am
In People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
” Welsh v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 6:52 am
Shaw v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:11 am
The Judge is also allowed to consider protection of society as a reason to go higher than the recommended guideline range (see People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
Cobb, 532 U.S. 162 (2001); and Sattazahn v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
They’ve been real heroes, great people to work with, and they put a lot of resources into this case. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:46 pm
On July 3rd the ILB posted an entry that began: "The 7th Circuit heard oral arguments in the case of Hindrichs v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:01 am
In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:55 am
In that case, the prosecutor and defendant negotiated a plea agreement that was not predicated upon a statement by the Court that it would sentence defendant to a specified term or within a specified range, see People v Cobbs, 443 Mich 276 (1993). [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:16 am
Should Roe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:07 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm
Cobb House, 157 Hill Street, Athens, GAThursday, October 24, 20133:30-5:00 | Keynote Address by Edward L. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act 1928Mari Takayanagi (Parliamentary Archives, UK)23. [read post]
