Search for: "People v. Duane"
Results 21 - 40
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2019, 7:03 am
Tillis's efforts to distance himself from (at least) the proposed overruling of the eBay v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm
Tries to address 1A issues including US v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am
Charles Duan asked whether patents protect national security. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:35 am
As we recently found out from the CA Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
” Sources: People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:42 am
Duan's concern is that if individual authors owned the IP in their interface contributions to standards (a potential extension of Oracle v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
Impose duty to monitor the markets they make; compliance of users, the quality and conduct of the people and businesses that use the platform. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
McGill v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 5:46 am
Earlier this week, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:03 pm
Born Duane Keith Davis, the rapper claims he wants to “come clean. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:17 am
” More recently, the court in its 1974 decision in Schick v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am
The first is South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
That’s the actual harm of dilution/tarnishment.Charles Duan, Implications of Oracle v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 8:47 am
Virginia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 1:25 pm
, Turner v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:25 am
Apple suggests that an award of triple Samsung’s total profit would be appropriate (at least in theory) and that makes no sense.Charles Duan, Public Knowledge: Patents affect a lot of people, not just tech/pharma. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:11 pm
Davis and Moore v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:58 am
In Davila v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:48 pm
She filed an amicus brief in support of defendant Duane Buck in Buck v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm
The chief justice wrote, “Our law punishes people for what they do, not who they are. [read post]