Search for: "People v. Howard (1988)" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2018, 1:30 am by Tessa Shepperson
Howard Davies v Scott – a tenancy deposit case A country Court case (reported on Nearly Legal) where a landlord was ordered to pay the full 3x the deposit penalty to the tenants – so is worth reading for that alone. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
  One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:15 am
Manuel Noriega raises his fists to acknowledge the crowd cheers during a Dignity Batallion rally in Panama City on May 20, 1988. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and its president Jon Coupal (crusaders for lower taxes in California who have made extensive use of the initiative process for decades) filed a petition in state court seeking to block Proposition 49 from appearing on the November ballot. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:16 am by Howard Knopf
Even actual “speakers” rarely get more than 8 minutes, unless they are very prominent people such as judges or senior government or WIPO people speaking on very important topics. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am by Rosalind English
In the case of Mr Moore, the High Court found that the case involved the murder of two or more people, sexual or sadistic conduct and a substantial degree of premeditation and that there were no mitigating circumstances. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
For instance, noted Mennonite theologian John Howard Yoder, noted Pentecostalist theologian David K. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]