Search for: "People v. Jacobs (1991)" Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am by Jennifer González
However, the precise definition of obscenity was unclear, and the Supreme Court would not rule that obscenity was not constitutionally protected speech until Roth v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
Many people think that the computer program exclusion means that there should be no patent protection available for computer programs at all. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
But we did choose a name and get an office and we opened our doors in September of 1991. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
From 1991-2019, the number of civilian-owned firearms in the United States more than doubled, to an estimated 434 million. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]