Search for: "People v. Kelly (1986)"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
”) State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:21 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
Evidence from micro-level patent application data or gobbledygook from the depths of legal academia?
18 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm
” from a post by Kelly Laycock.The logic and style of the arguments about patent examiners is indeed incomprehensible.Perhaps "patenthawk" should include law review articles, in addition to court decisions, within his scope; from a recent post on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986)(a Fourth Amendment violation occurs when the government invades a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy.) [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503 (1986) (Jewish Air Force psychologist who objected to a no-headgear rule); Jenkins v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
In Henry v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[7] Judges charged with making these custody decisions “rarely received the expert testimony of native people who could familiarize [them] with traditional child-rearing practices,” but instead relied upon the testimony of non-Indian social workers who were ignorant of the ways and traditions of Native Americans.[8] These social workers often advised courts that the abject poverty of many Indian families prevented them from properly parenting their… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[7] Judges charged with making these custody decisions “rarely received the expert testimony of native people who could familiarize [them] with traditional child-rearing practices,” but instead relied upon the testimony of non-Indian social workers who were ignorant of the ways and traditions of Native Americans.[8] These social workers often advised courts that the abject poverty of many Indian families prevented them from properly parenting their… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm
Cynthia Rosicki then went on to New York Law School, graduating in 1986. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:01 am
She explained that she does not agreed with the standardized test for stare decisis in Chief Justice Kelly’s opinion in Peterson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Kelly, No. 01-2736 "Denial of petitions for writs of habeas corpus are affirmed where although English language deficiency can warrant tolling of the AEDPA limitations period, petitioners have failed to allege circumstances establishing the due diligence required to warrant tolling. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
W.Va. holds that surreptitious single party recording in the target's home violates the state constitution, overruling prior authority from 1986 that did not consider the state constitution, rejecting United States v. [read post]
