Search for: "People v. Knight (1980)" Results 21 - 40 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Janus didn't discuss Turner or PruneYard, and mentioned Rumsfeld only for the narrow proposition that "government may not 'impose penalties or withhold benefits based on membership in a disfavored group' where doing so 'ma[kes] group membership less attractive.'"[134] And the compelled contribution cases, of which Janus is the most recent, have drawn a line between compelling people to fund the views expressed by a particular private speaker (such as the… [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:49 am by Eugene Volokh
Knight First Amendment Institute, concurring in the decision to vacate as moot Trump v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm by Schachtman
”[6] In the United Kingdom, men who have contributed greatly to an activity and who have gained national and international respect are knighted by the Queen and become Knight Commanders of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:48 pm by Jack Goldsmith, Marty Lederman
Knight’s office began reviewing the manuscript, which was more than 500 pages long. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Standard of Review and Applicable LawThe test for legal sufficiency is "whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]