Search for: "People v. Layman"
Results 21 - 40
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2017, 6:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 10:44 am
But now co-blogger Bob V tips us to a company that claims to have a real-life version:"GWG Life ... started requiring those people to turn over a saliva sample. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 10:03 am
How would you describe your job to other people? [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 5:46 am
Deere & Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:03 pm
McLaughlin v. [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 3:17 pm
" To put it in layman's terms, the arbitration provisions of the CBA must be as clear as the river stream on a winter's day and written so that normal people can understand it.This CBA did not satisfy that standard. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
I'm certain -- or at least hope -- that this opinion corrects this practice.Though, in the meantime, there are all these people, like Mr. [read post]
22 May 2016, 3:00 am
In layman’s terms: the pie in the sky defence. [read post]
14 May 2016, 1:01 am
On this day in history, Lord Mansfield of the King’s Bench in England issued a ruling in the case of Somerset v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
My own, layman’s, analysis does not advocate that arbitration should be a law unto itself or indeed a law at all. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am
Some might argue that Patent law and the systems which regulate it are just as complicated (and as confusing to the layman?) [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
They assumed that the meaning of the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:05 pm
See People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 11:41 am
In Circuit Check v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:25 am
The Supreme Court of Virginia recently issued its opinion in the case Shevlin Smith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:25 am
The Supreme Court of Virginia recently issued its opinion in the case Shevlin Smith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:25 am
The Supreme Court of Virginia recently issued its opinion in the case Shevlin Smith v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:47 pm
This got short shrift from the judge who quoted the Hoffman v Dare judgment. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
Here to lead readers through the case is solicitor and long-time Katfriend Richard Kempner, who explains as follows:In Fresh v Deepend the courts found in favour of Fresh (the people behind the Innocent smoothie brand), in its hotly-contested action as to who owns the copyright in the ‘Dude’ (the stylised face with halo, right), the logo used by Innocent for the past 15 years on all its smoothie bottles. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 8:21 pm
I litigated their validity for the first time in federal court in US v. [read post]
