Search for: "People v. Lord (1994)"
Results 21 - 40
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
It was by Lord Donaldson in 1981: “No particular form of award is required. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
Some people credit Thompson with framing the question that Sen. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
The Justices considered two previous judgments in which it/the House of Lords has held suspicionless stop and search powers to comply with article 8 (R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2006] UKHL 12; Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2015] UKSC 49) and the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) decision in Gillan v UK (2010) application no. 4158/05, in which it held that the suspicionless search power under section 44 of the… [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
That’s how curiosities like s. 10(6) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 came about. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Lord Tomlin firmly and unequivocally rejected the very approach that, it will be seen, has won favour with the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:52 am
The appeal was heard, and unanimously dismissed, by a panel of five Supreme Court justices comprising Lord Neuberger, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
It is not sufficient that the repute would lead people in England to visit the venue when they visited Paris (Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
As was stated by Lord Justice Gibson in Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd: "...the defence has never been held to apply to names of new companies as otherwise a route to piracy would be obvious". [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
Pro-studio change in 1994-95, and enforcement complaints continue through 1997. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Lord have mercy, judges and lawyers must now actually read and analyze the bases of expert witnesses’ opinions, assess validity of studies and conclusions, and present their challenges and evaluations in clear, non-technical language. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
., Textbook of Clinical Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1, 13-14 (Phila. 1994); David F. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm
” Eighteen months later Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the whole Court of Appeal in Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd, said the opposite: “Thus copyright is antithetical to freedom of expression. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
” 18 months later Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the whole Court of Appeal in Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd, said the opposite: “Thus copyright is antithetical to freedom of expression. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:59 am
See, for example, Campbell v. [read post]
