Search for: "People v. Moore (2002)" Results 21 - 40 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm by Chris Attig
Instead, I’ll pick up the story in 2002, when the VA Secretary issued an M-21 manual provision that found that the definition of the phrase “service in the Republic of Vietnam” in  38 C.F.R. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Beijing is a fascinating city, officially 20 million, but some say it is closer to 30 million people because of the uncounted people who come to Beijing for the jobs. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
The nation’s highest court ruled the execution of an inmate with an intellectual disability violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unjust punishments” in the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
The nation’s highest court ruled the execution of an inmate with an intellectual disability violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unjust punishments” in the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
The nation’s highest court ruled the execution of an inmate with an intellectual disability violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unjust punishments” in the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:10 am by SHG
This fall, in Moore v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Finlayson Rule of the Admirals: Law, Custom, and Naval Government in Newfoundland, 1699-1832 by Jerry Bannister 2002 The Law Makers: Judicial Power and the Shaping of Canadian Federalism by John T. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  With advances in computer technology making genetic testing exponentially cheaper and more detailed as times passes (see Moore’s law), more and more genetic variability in the efficacy of prescription drugs is bound to be discovered. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:58 am
Moore, 639 F.3d 443, 447–48 (8th Cir.2011) (affirming admission of profane and violent rap recordings over Fed.R.Evid. 403 challenge where lyrics were probative of defendant’s participation in narcotics conspiracy); United States v. [read post]