Search for: "People v. Paulsen" Results 21 - 40 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am by Jeffrey Sonnenfeld
  The authors are two highly conservative, leading legal scholars, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
"Baude and Paulsen then spend 14 law review pages and countless footnotes explaining why Chase was wrong on every point he made. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm by Stephen Sachs
Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Worst Constitutional Decision of All Time, 78 Notre Dame L. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:27 am by Michael Stokes Paulsen
Michael Stokes Paulsen is Distinguished University Chair and Professor at the University of St. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm by Sandy Levinson
 One such honorable conservative is Michael Stokes Paulsen, who has a valuable analysis of the electoral college and the constitutionally-guaranteed autonomy of electors. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
The term “power of judicial review” was not used in Marbury v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:29 am
My thanks, once again, to Eugene Volokh for the invitation to guest-blog this week about some of the themes in my co-authored book with my son, Luke Paulsen, “The Constitution: An Introduction. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:22 pm
The people, by throwing themselves into either scale, will infallibly make it preponderate. [read post]