Search for: "People v. Ray (1996)" Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am by madeo-design
  Unfortunately, Ray had few clients due to prejudice against both Black people and women, and was eventually forced to close her practice. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:10 pm
Gore], 517 U.S. 559 (1996), outlined a three-part test to evaluate the constitutionality of such awards. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:37 am by Moria Miller
“This decision… is the first really powerful ray of hope that things are changing now. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:33 am by Steve Hall
"Missouri AG Seeks Execution Dates for Neo-Nazi Mass-murderer, Good Samaritan-killer," is the staff report from today's Kansas City InfoZine.The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit had put Missouri's death-penalty protocol on hold while it reviewed certain facts in Clemons v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
 In this instance, Driver had already been transported to a hospital, treated, and apparently released by the time Trooper Ray asked the Driver to submit to a blood test. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Maybe we need to balance incentives for marginal artists v. incentives for most popular, instead of incentives v. access. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), and with PMA devices currently. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:51 am by Dennis Crouch
On July 27th the USPTO set up more stringent rules for the issuance of BMPs in their Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in View of Bilski v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:41 pm by Dennis Crouch
On July 27th the USPTO set up more stringent rules for the issuance of BMPs in their Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in View of Bilski v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:00 am by John Gregory
ACLU v Mukasey 534 F.3d.181  (3d Circ. 2008). [read post]