Search for: "People v. Richard (1978)" Results 21 - 40 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
(Christian Shepherd, "Looking to the Future: Xi Shuts the Door on the Past," The Washington Post (7 November 2021)("Only two previous leaders of China have previously  adjudicated on party history: Mao Zedong, the founder of the People's Republic, and Deng Xiaoping, the strongman leader who unleashed market reforms in 1978. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Elisabeth Hagen (August 2010- December 2013), Richard Allen Raymond (July 2005–January 2009), Elsa A. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Brett Raffish
” However, the Supreme Court reversed course in 1978, holding in Monell v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
And the director of national intelligence position was filled by an acting official for 188 days, most recently by Richard Grenell, a Trump loyalist with little intelligence experience. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]
“When multiple interventions were introduced early, they were very effective in 1918,” one of the researchers, Richard Hatchett, told the New York Times. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
On the subject generally, see also Richard Schragger, What is “Government” “Speech”? [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  In the case of all natural rights, the people understood that the government’s role was to preserve natural rights against interference from private actors and to restrain the exercise of these natural rights in circumstances where the people’s representatives in the legislature had determined that such restraint was for the public good. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
The year before Harlan’s nomination the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]