Search for: "People v. Rose (1997)" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm by David Kopel
The story is told in: Ross Thomson, Structures of Change in the Mechanical Age: Technological Innovation in the United States 1790-1865 (2009); Alexander Rose, American Rifle: A Biography (2008); David R. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court of New Zealand 2004-2013© 2015 Thomson Reuters New Zealandedited by Matthew Barber and Mary-Rose Russell, Senior Lecturers in Law, Auckland University of Technology Excerpt: selections from Chapter 3: A Barrister’s Perspective by James Farmer QC [Footnotes omitted. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
” It was that “American Mormons were engaging in a practice thought to be characteristic of Asiatic and African peoples who were believed, at the time, to be civilizationally and racially inferior. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
 As discussed here, if considered satire, not parody, Dumb Starbucks could be liable for infringement (Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997)).It seems unlikely that adding DUMB- provides enough distinction for it to avoid being considered an unauthorised derivative of Starbucks’ copyrighted works. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
Weapon parody, however, is what most other people would call a satire. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Rose, “Establishing Causation with Epidemiology,” in Tee L. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:30 pm
Daily et al. reflex, (1997), 115 Man.R. (2d) 27. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
” Attitude to Human Rights A number of people have been talking and thinking this week about human rights more broadly, and our attitude towards them. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
At issue was Thames Water’s liability for alleged odours and mosquito infestations affecting people living in properties near the Mogden Sewage Treatment Works in Middlesex. [read post]