Search for: "People v. Underwood" Results 21 - 40 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
” The latest Edelman Trust survey has revealed that two-thirds (67%) of people globally have said that they believe journalists purposely try to mislead people by saying things that are false or grossly exaggerated. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
Detective Inspector Vicky Vessey said: “The utter disdain he has for the people he targets to steal from is abundantly clear from the lyrics in his social media post. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 13 April 2022, Nicklin J handed down judgment in the MPI and breach of data rights case of (1) Underwood, (2) Underwood v (1) Bounty UK Ltd, (2) Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2022] EWHC 888 (QB). [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The post cites the costs to privacy, freedom of speech (such as the ‘legal but harmful’ concept), the ‘duty of care’ demanded of online service providers to limit or even ban both encryption and anonymity, the political control of censorship via Ofcom, and the “mammoth and costly bureaucratic burdens being foisted on people operating online services” as some of the many reasons that the proposed Bill might be doing more harm than good. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
At least 147 people were sickened, and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
These scams include embedded cyberattacks that “steal people’s personal data, peddle dodgy financial investments or break into bank accounts. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm by Steve Sanders
” The Court has demonstrated time again – in Underwood, as well as cases like Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Clean Up the Internet has published its support of the UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport’s revised measures to protect people from anonymous trolls with the Online Safety Bill. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:14 pm by Georgialee Lang
Underwood 2015 BCSC 1410 is a prime example of perjury under oath. [read post]