Search for: "People v. Ward (1998)" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
Subsequent case law has found that the duty might (depending on the facts of specific cases) apply to the following situations: prison authorities protecting inmates from harm from other prisoners [Edwards v UK (2002) 36 EHRR 487], or from suicide [Keenan v UK (2001) 33 EHRR 913]; immigrants in administrative detention [Slimani v France (2006) 43 EHRR 49]; military conscripts [Lilinc V Turkey (App. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:29 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, Pattern Jury Instructions 4.06 (1998). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The founders of the United States understood that “an ignorant people cannot remain a free people and that democracy cannot survive too much ignorance. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am by INFORRM
The rubric is the warning that traditionally appears at the top of a judgment telling people what they can and can’t do with it. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Ward, 350 Md. 372, 712 A.2d 534 (1998), which involved search warrants for weapons in the defendants' homes. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm by Emily Coward
A California appellate court will address this question in People v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[9] Thus, for instance, that some people are offended or alienated by an employee's religion does not justify the employer in firing the employee. [read post]