Search for: "Person v. Clayton"
Results 21 - 40
of 608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2024, 5:44 pm
Clayton County, Georgia, the Supreme Court held that an employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender unconstitutionally discriminates against that person because of sex under Title VII. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Clayton Cnty., 140 S. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Biden v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 18 December 2023, HHJ Clayton handed down judgement in favour of the plaintiff in the case of Spencer v McKay [2023] VCC 2238. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
See, e.g., Revak v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm
Clayton Cnty., Georgia, 590 U.S. — -, 140 S. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:47 pm
Ohio 1993), aff’d 43 F.3d 1076 (6th Cir. 1995); and Vermont, Clayton v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 15 November 2023, HHJ Clayton handed down judgement in the defamation case of Iskander v Barcos [2023] VCC 2074. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:03 pm
Clayton County. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Uddin v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:18 am
Clayton Cnty., Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that Title VII extended to situations in which "an employer … intentionally treats a person worse because of sex—such as by firing the person for actions or attributes it would tolerate in an individual of another sex. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
I’ll avoid starting with the history of antitrust law in general because I think the right place to start here is we have a law in the United States, the Clayton Act, that specifically regulates mergers. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:45 am
The Supreme Court in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 11:31 am
In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:34 pm
From Westenbroek v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 8:17 am
Clayton Cnty., Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that Title VII extended to situations in which "an employer … intentionally treats a person worse because of sex—such as by firing the person for actions or attributes it would tolerate in an individual of another sex. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
” [Administrative Code § 7-201(c)(2)]Seems like RDW tripped up, again.# # #DECISIONW. v New York City Dept. of Transp. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
[This is a long read, but very important for FOIA litigators!] [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Clayton County. [read post]
