Search for: "Person v. General Motors Corp."
Results 21 - 40
of 532
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Historically, directors have been protected from personal liability in connection with risk management by the high standard set in the seminal 1996 Caremark[1]case. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
Okay, maybe the reader could have done without the page and a half about general personal jurisdiction, because obviously that doesn't exist, and no one (as far as I can tell, anyway) is even arguing that it does. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 7:04 am
” General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:40 am
Mead Corp. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
Passage Media Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
Ct. 1876, 1889 n.4 (2018). [6] Unelko Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 2:27 pm
General Motors Corp., 692 NE 2d 286 – Ill: Supreme Court 1998 Clearly a surprise exhibit is adverse and prejudicial. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:49 pm
v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
’” (Id. at p. 305; see Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:43 am
Gering, commanding general of the 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 7:33 am
Haven v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 7:33 am
Haven v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 8:04 am
General Motors Corp., 906 F. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 11:28 am
Stakeholders v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:40 am
Corp., Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-SL2 v DB Structured Prods., Inc., 25 NY3d 581, 593-594 [2015]; Ely-Cruikshank Co., 81 NY2d at 404). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 3:44 am
R&L established prima facie that it provided the advice expected of legal counsel exercising ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge and that it did not breach any duty toward plaintiffs (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 49-50 [2015]). [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:05 am
General Motors Corp.: the relationship between the attorney and the former client, the time between the cases, the size of the firm, the nature of the disqualified attorney’s involvement in the case and the timing of the ‘wall.'” [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:59 am
Corp. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
Proof that the plaintiff has submitted "enough facts to enable [the] court to determine that a viable" cause of action exists (Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d at 71; see Gray v Doyle, 170 AD3d at 971) may be established by an affidavit of a party or someone with knowledge, authenticated documentary proof, or by complaint verified by the plaintiff that sufficiently details the facts and the basis for the defendant's liability (see CPLR 105[u];… [read post]
