Search for: "Persons v. Cochran"
Results 21 - 40
of 203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
In Badgerow v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:04 pm
Cochran. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 11:30 am
Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 183 (1981), quoting Cochrane, v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Deshaney v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am
Peter Baker and Emily Cochrane report for the New York Times. [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:31 pm
In Cochran v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Ct.), and Jarkesy v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 12:44 pm
Hegar v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Cochran, No. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 1:19 pm
Several years ago, a California appellate court heard a case where the employee was seeking reimbursement for cell phone charges, even though the employee had a pre-existing unlimited cell phone plan (Cochran v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Cochran’s article It Takes Two to Tango! [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:58 am
³ See, Murphy v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 2:22 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
• Cathy Cochran, 76, of Wimberley, died February 7, 2021. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 8:07 am
The 2005 Tory v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
Subjective and Objective Standards for Determining the Parties’ Intentions Depending on the jurisdiction, courts use either an objective or subjective standard to determine the parties’ intentions.[30] In jurisdictions that use a subjective standard, the parties’ intentions are considered a question of fact, not a question of law, and courts thus defer the question to the jury to determine.[31] In jurisdictions that use an objective standard, courts look at “what a reasonably… [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 2:58 am
Cochran and Christine L. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:35 am
Muller, Celebrating the Work of Professor Bob Cochran: An Introduction, (47 Pepperdine Law Review iii (2020)).Andrew M. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
Brandenburg v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm
The Malouf court held that a person could incur liability under Sections 10(b) and 17(a) for failing to correct a misstatement or omission even “when the conduct involves another person’s false or misleading statement. [read post]
