Search for: "Pfizer Manufacturing Holdings LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Pfizer, Inc., 196 F. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 490 F. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
Pfizer, Inc., 914 F. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Therefore, we hold today that a plaintiff who does not read an allegedly inadequate warning cannot maintain a negligent-failure-to-adequately-warn action unless the nature of the alleged inadequacy is such that it prevents him from reading it.Id. at 971.This ruling has been extended to situations where the prescriber fails to read a warning. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:11 pm
Apotex Inc. et al. 1:13-cv-01613; filed September 25, 2013 in the District Court of Delaware • Plaintiffs: Pfizer Inc.; Wyeth LLC; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals LLC; PF Prism C.V.; Pfizer Manufacturing Holdings LLC • Defendants: Apotex Inc.; Apotex Corp. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Mirror Worlds, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Pfizer, Inc., 877 F. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Such disincentive is the necessary byproduct of divorcing product liability from product manufacturing. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Wyeth LLC, 872 F. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:46 am
CNA Holdings LLC 10. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:22 pm
Wyeth LLC, ___ F. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
It did so, we would argue, in direct contravention of the holding in Buckingham rejecting “social engineering” through product liability litigation.There was one final bulwark against absolute liability in Bartlett – Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A, comment k (1965), the “unavoidably unsafe product” doctrine, recognized in Brochu. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am
Pfizer, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Wyeth LLC, 131 S. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Zimmer Holdings, Inc., 2011 WL 5509420, at *4 (W.D. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
LLC, 2011 WL 3666595, at *3 (W.D. [read post]
29 May 2011, 12:01 pm
" Citizens of Humanity, LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
To get on this list the court has to hold that there is no separate duty to test apart from well-established product liability claims for warning, design, or (maybe) manufacturing defect.West v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:19 am
Ameridose, LLC (Patent Docs) Neutrokine-? [read post]
