Search for: "Phillip H. March" Results 21 - 40 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2008, 10:00 pm
Trosten and Grant's case is scheduled to go to trial in March. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:52 pm
The latest issue of the International Studies Quarterly (Vol. 65, no. 1, March 2021) is out. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
"Tom Frost (University of Leicester) has posted a "teaching resource" of interest: "Phillips v Eyre – A Study of Constitutional Law and Empire. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 6:05 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Johnathan Riffe, No. 113,746 (Reno)Sentencing appeal (petition for review)Patrick H. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:07 am by Stephen Fairley
  And what I love about my work is interacting with hundreds of bright, passionate attorneys like those I meet at our two-day law firm marketing intensive, the Rainmaker Retreat – people like Nashville personal injury attorney, trial consultant, and the former President of the Tennessee Association of Justice Phillip H. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Princeton, New Jersey on Pi Day, March 14. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
”  As Story’s greatest biographer noted, “[H]ere, in language all too plain for some, was an argument for the return of fugitive slaves anchored solidly in the Constitution and backed by the greatest living authority on American constitutional law. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 7:25 am by Alfred Brophy
Ron Harris 60 A Comparative History of Insurance Law in Europe Phillip Hellwege 66 Legal History as Political Thought Roman J. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by admin
March 28, 2013 Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP) (Upcoming note for Associations+) Just as with any other board of directors, directors of trade and profession associations generally owe duties of loyalty, care and skill to their organizations. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm by Blog Editorial
Peter Stewart v The Queen (Jamaica), heard 28 March 2011. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:02 am by Joanna Buckley, Matrix Chambers.
The Supreme Court held that “only the gravest effects of interference with family life will be capable of rendering extradition disproportionate to the public interest that it serves” (per Lord Phillips at para. 82). [read post]