Search for: "Piper v. Piper"
Results 21 - 40
of 516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2023, 6:41 pm
” In Kramer v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
DLA Piper summarised the implications of the decision. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
Data privacy and data protection DLA Piper published an article summarising the recent decision of the European Court of Justice regarding the interpretation of Article 82 of the GDPR. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
Osborne Clarke, TechMonitor, FinTech Times, Mishcon de Reya, DLA Piper, the Privacy and Information Law Blog and the Data Protection Report have more information. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
” DLA Piper, Pinsent Masons and Mischon de Reya summarise the key changes in the proposed legislation, but suggest that there is very little material difference between the second bill and its predecessor. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
DLA Piper provides an update on the EU-US adequacy decision for the US and the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:06 am
” “Firms signing onto the new brief include Kirkland & Ellis, Latham & Watkins, Cravath Swaine & Moore, and DLA Piper, some of the highest-grossing law firms and competitors of the Washington-based Covington. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
DLA Piper has more information here. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 6:07 am
” (Face book, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610,615 [1st Dept 2015] [internal citations and quotations omitted].) [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
DLA Piper also covers the adequacy decision here. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Lee v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm
ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5 This was the seminal privacy case of the year, decided by the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:33 am
The misconduct alleged by plaintiffs is also sufficiently “egregious” to support a Judiciary Law § 487 claim—consisting of the reiteration of allegations Balestriere knew to be false in multiple filings, even after receipt of information refuting these allegations and even after being sanctioned (see generally Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am
The complaint otherwise failed to state a cause of action for breach of contract or violation of Judiciary Law § 487(1) (see generally Second Source Funding, LLC v Yellowstone Capital, LLC, 144 AD3d 445, 445-446 [1st Dept 2016]; Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird, LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 669 [1st Dept 2017]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]; CPLR 3211[a][7]). [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
DLA Piper has more information here. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:57 am
On appeal, Dentons challenged the jury verdict and lost again Revolaze LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
” DLA Piper has an article on the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) recommendations on lawful methods of using personal information and artificial intelligence. [read post]
