Search for: "Polk v. Good" Results 21 - 40 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2019, 8:04 am by Dan Bressler
” After various facts played out and an unhappy client sued, said the Court: “‘An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
See, AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 (2007); Keld v Giddins Claman, LLP, 170 AD3d 589, 589 (lSt Dep’t 2019) . [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:06 pm
In what some viewed as a possible harbinger of good things, the court allowed Weissmann a few minutes to explain his position at oral arguments. [read post]
30 May 2008, 4:15 am
  Plaintiffs were able to show many departures [deviations from good and accepted practice], but came up short in the legal malpractice case. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 9:09 pm
  Fed.R.Crim.P. 23(b)(3) permits a jury of 11 jurors to return a verdict "if the court finds good cause to excuse a juror. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:36 am by Broc Romanek
Rule 506(d)(2) provides that the disqualification “shall not apply . . . upon a showing of good cause and without prejudice to any other action by the Commission, if the Commission determines that it is not necessary under the circumstances that an exemption be denied. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Lawyers want to get paid, whether they are in good relations with the client or not. [read post]