Search for: "Polk v. Good" Results 21 - 40 of 119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2019, 3:35 am
Teresa Stanek Rea and Professor Colleen V. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
See, AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 (2007); Keld v Giddins Claman, LLP, 170 AD3d 589, 589 (lSt Dep’t 2019) . [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:04 am by Dan Bressler
” After various facts played out and an unhappy client sued, said the Court: “‘An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Lawyers want to get paid, whether they are in good relations with the client or not. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Akhil Amar
" He had been tipped off about the Supreme Court’s decision in the Dred Scott v. [read post]