Search for: "Poole v. Baker"
Results 21 - 40
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2020, 6:24 am
Funding link here: https://paypal.me/pools/c/8orbLzpxbY. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:55 pm
On Title VII and employment discrimination: I have seen a remarkable amount of commentary in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision in Bostock v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
by Dennis Crouch Peter v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
Also see ---> Private student loan collection suit not removable to federal court (addressing state vs. federal jurisdiction issue in context of original collection suit; sanctions imposed for improper removal in Richards v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm
Persephone Bridgman Baker provides a useful analysis of the merits of ABC itself. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:50 am
Data from the NCSL and from Findlaw was pooled to generate this map on death penalty policies. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am
Challenges to Obama-era tip pooling regulation dropped from docket. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
The “prize” is a government monopoly that allows the holder to charge prices in excess of the free market price for the term of the monopoly.Pros – (i) It allows companies to recoup their research costs by monopoly pricing for the duration of the patent; and (ii) the monopoly incentive may encourage research spending.Cons- (i) It may reduce, as well as add, to the pool of knowledge that others can draw upon; (ii) the monopoly may serve to reduce incentives to invest in R… [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
Baker, the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 1:00 pm
Puppy in Civil Procedure Clark v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 5:40 pm
For more on fair tax v. flat tax v. our current system, click here. 9:53 p.m. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:57 am
(Photo by POOL Win McNamee/Getty Images) Chief Justice Roberts invokes Lochner v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Constitution by depriving same-sex couples of the fundamental right to marry, including recognition of their lawful, out-of-state marriages; (2) whether a state impermissibly infringes upon same-sex couples’ fundamental right to interstate travel by refusing to recognize their lawful out-of-state marriages; and (3) whether this Court’s summary dismissal in Baker v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:21 am
See, e.g., Baker v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
The lower courts in Baker v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:45 am
It bears signatures of then-Attorney General John Ashcroft, Comey, Goldsmith, and Justice Department Attorney James Baker, and consists of two essential parts: an introduction, and a legal analysis. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Lust v. [read post]
