Search for: "Porter v. State of Florida"
Results 21 - 40
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
[Disclosure: Arnold & Porter is among the counsel to the plaintiffs in this case.] [read post]
24 May 2018, 2:11 pm
” Florida v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am
Vance Spath placed the United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:30 am
” In an op-ed for the Tallahassee Democrat, Bill Cotterell notes that the Florida First Amendment Foundation recently bestowed an award on Fane Lozman, the plaintiff in Lozman v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:22 am
Madison to Batson v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:22 am
Madison to Batson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
In Porter v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:15 pm
(The Ninth Circuit BAP held state specific bankruptcy exemptions constitutional in Applebaum v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm
Porter v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:52 pm
The class action Carter v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:34 am
“ Lozano v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:58 am
Porter Bancorp, Inc., 2015 WL 1471020, at *8 (W.D. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Under Porter v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Porter v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 7:43 am
Additional Resources: SOBE Club Pays $5 Million for Bouncer’s Alleged Brutality, Aug. 26, 2015, By Gary Nelson, CBS Miami More Blog Entries: Porter v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 10:05 am
Plaintiffs attorneys in Porter v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 4:11 am
” Florida v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
