Search for: "Powers v. Jones et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2022, 12:25 am
Quick links Mark Kaye et al, Lexology: UK HR Two Minute Monthly: inter alia, on Ali v Heathrow Express Operating Company Limited & Anor (scroll down). [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:15 am
Sutton’s article Law Student Attitudes about their Experience in the COVID-19 Transition to Online Learning is cited in the following article: Steven Foster et al., Closing the Law School Gap: A Collaborative Effort to Address Educational Inequities Through Free, Asynchronous Tools, 14 J. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
V Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Pix Credit: Michael A. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 8:47 pm
(Jamie Boucher et al., Skadden). [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
The Case: Raichura v Jones Briefly, Jones represented Raichura in a family law dispute in 2005. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am
All of this is to say: now more than ever, there is regulatory appetite and political will in Australia to hold Facebook et al accountable. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:15 pm
Here are some resources for submitting comments for the former:- Asylum Seekers Have Power! [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 12:18 pm
VANCE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, ET AL. and TRUMP ET AL. v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 09380-19 Clattenburg v dailystar.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 08479-19 Forbes v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 08417-19 Cooney et al. v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 08376-19 Malone v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy… [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:17 am
Live blog of hand-down. 1026: The judgment will be available once the hand down is complete. 1027: Counsel et al taking their seats. 1033: Lady Hale setting out the timeline. 1036: The issue is justiciable, and a unanimous decision of all 11 Justices. 1038: This court has concluded that this case is about the limits of the power to advise the Monarch. 1039: Relevant limit on the power to prorogue is – unlawful if it frustrates or prevents the ability… [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
Industrial Service Solutions, et al., Case No. 18-30136 (5th Cir., April 19, 2019). [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
Industrial Service Solutions, et al., Case No. 18-30136 (5th Cir., April 19, 2019). [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
So much for equity when dispensing justice using appellate power. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
Plaintiffs’ counsel, Dickie Scruggs, et al., withdrew her before the defense could conduct an examination before trial. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
The National Collegiate MasterStudent Trust et al, dated Oct. 19, 2018 (pdf). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
(relisted after the October 26 conference) CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Jones v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
A landmark case in the struggle for equality was Westminster School Dist. of Orange County et al. v. [read post]
