Search for: "Powers v. Maine School Administrative District No. 1" Results 21 - 40 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
District Court to declare the 1976 judgment void, alleging the County “illegally contracted away its police powers over its statutory land use authority when it entered into the judgment. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 10:34 am by Amy Howe
Makin, the court struck down a Maine program that provided public funding for students to attend private schools, but prohibited the use of state money at schools that provide religious instruction. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
There are approximately 180,000 elementary and secondary school children in the state spread out over 260 public school districts. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
In a nutshell, you cannot sue a government agency or a school district, unless it’s done within a certain period of time after suffering an injury or loss. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
All of these challenges can be seen, moreover, as warm-up acts—if not stalking horses—for the main event: a challenge to former President Trump’s eligibility, should he try to run again. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
So, let me introduce you to Mostyn 1… In Appleton v Gallagher [2015] EWHC 2689 (Fam), a case involving two high profile celebrities, Mostyn 1 decided that the 2009 rule change made no difference to the privacy arising from the implied undertaking. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
To see why, it helps to begin with what has been the most important administrative law case for nearly four decades.In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
This post will cover the major statutory and constitutional questions raised in the case. (1) The litigation background. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
The amicus briefs cite the Donahue Study for two main points. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Bruen, the Court may consider whether to elaborate on its statement in District of Columbia v. [read post]