Search for: "Powers v. Nuclear Support Services, Inc"
Results 21 - 40
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2018, 9:00 am
Either way, Kraninger’s confirmation seems inevitable, given the Senate Democrats’ decision in 2013 to use the “nuclear option” and eliminate a 60-vote cloture requirement for confirming non-Supreme Court presidential nominations. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:36 am
As the licensee for the power plant at issue, Entergy Operations signed a CBA with a union to provide security guard services. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:10 pm
Applying the Supreme Court’s seminal 1984 decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
As I shall explain, Scalia was right and Gorsuch is wrong.The Chevron Doctrine and Justice ScaliaThe Chevron doctrine gets its name from a 1984 case, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
After the US Supreme Court supported the environmental authorities' views in 2007, Duke entered into a settlement as late as in 2015 in which it undertook to install the necessary treatment plants and to pay a total of just over USD 5 million in fines and for measures. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:40 am
Pyongyang was slapped with the strongest sanctions in two decades after its nuclear test and long-range rocket launch earlier this year. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
“Up to this point, we have done everything that is both within our power and within the law to help them,” it continued. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am
" <> Turlock Irrigation District v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am
Electric Power Supply Association, et al – Supreme Court Docket Electric Power Supply Asso. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
COMPENSATORY DAMAGES; BEING SENT HOME FOR EXPRESSING SAFETY AND HEALTH CONCERNS SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT NOMINAL AWARD OF $500 FOR EMOTIONAL DISTRESS In Jackson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
<> NRC Issues Final Environmental Impact Statement for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal - The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its final supplemental environmental impact statement for the proposed renewal of the operating license for the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant located in Oak Harbor, about 23 miles east of Toledo, which concludes there are no environmental impacts … [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
Colleen V. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
The Delaware Supreme Court’s May 8, 2014 Opinion in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Marys Cement Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
<> Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
<> Case Update: Michigan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
The Appeals Court confirmed the decision of the Court of Federal Claims that AmerGen may not include future nuclear decommissioning liabilities that it assumed when it purchased three nuclear power plants in the basis of the acquired assets in its 2001 through 2003 tax returns. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am
In another high-profile criminal case, a federal grand jury indicted five high-ranking officials of the PRC’s People’s Liberation Army for computer hacking, economic espionage and other offenses directed at American companies in the nuclear power, metals and solar products industries. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:35 am
Waxman Statement on Supreme Court's Decision in UARG v. [read post]
