Search for: "Prescott v. Veri" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
Second, at 10.30am on the same date in Court 1 Foskett J will hand down judgment on the renewed application for permission to apply for judicial review by Lord Prescott, Chris Bryant MP and others (R (on the application of Bryant and ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
   Lord Prescott announced his intention to pursue a judicial review claim against the Metropolitan Police Commissioner. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
Hostility to privacy injunctions is not, as Lord Prescott fondly imagines, a conspiracy by newspapers to preserve profits. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:05 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  If the police had complied with their obligations under the Human Rights Act in the first place, the history of the phone-hacking scandal would have been very different. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm by Carl Custer
Very few subjects used a food thermometer. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
We acknowledge that this was a close case that was very well briefed and argued by the appellant. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
We acknowledge that this was a close case that was very well briefed and argued by the appellant. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  First, there was a short directions hearing in the judicial review claim brought against the police by Chris Bryant MP, Lord Prescott and others. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
Center for Attention Deficit and Learning Disorders Phone: (602) 990-4474 Prescott area Marcia T. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
The Metropolitan Police conceded the “phone hacking” judicial review case brought by Chris Bryant MP, former Deputy Prime Minister Lord Prescott, ex Deputy Assistant Commissioner Brian Paddick, Ben Jackson and an anonymous claimant, “HJK”, and agreed to a declaration that it had breached the claimants’ Article 8 rights. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
  Legal tech tools still very much depend on lawyers and their unique skill sets and capacity to understand legal reasoning. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
In the latter case, the lump sum payment cannot exceed $12,500 or half of the maximum lump sum award.57 The maximum lump sum amount of $25,000 seems to be awarded only very rarely, and very few of the decisions have ever granted that amount for a single claim. [read post]