Search for: "Price v. Sims"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Sims. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Concord EFS, Inc. 13-63Issue: Whether a plaintiff who purchases directly from a member of a price-fixing conspiracy is necessarily a “direct purchaser” under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Silicon Valley v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:10 am
She will get no free ride or food, at the expense of another consumer forced to pay an inflated price. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
V. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/Swn Amador v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
In Oppenheimer v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Tugendhat J referred to the judgment of the House of Lords in Sim v Stretch ([1936] 2 All ER 1237) and to the judgment of Sharp J in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd ([2009] EWHC 2779 (QB)) and held that, “whatever definition of ‘defamatory’ is adopted, it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims” [89]. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Shanks v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
Neither Sim v Stretch nor Jameel are directed to the issue and provide no clear support for the approach. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:43 pm
As Joe Sims has observed, “elections matter,” so a change in enforcement policy would not be all that surprising. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:35 am
The Justices seemed far more interested in the jury issue than in the other high-profile question before them in Skilling v. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 2:00 am
– a musician reflections on the problems and opportunities that come with the web (1709 Copyright Blog) Global - Trade Marks & Domain Names A sad if salutary tale – the price of a domain name? [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:01 pm
Indeed, Justice Antonin Scalia earlier this year urged the Supreme Court to take up the issue in his dissent from denial of certiorari in Sorich, et al v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:18 am
Sims, 2009 U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
And no one disputes the providers' right to raise prices to account for this additional cost of doing business. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
