Search for: "Primary Care Medical Services, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am by Daniel J. Gilman
On June 21, the FTC filed a complaint alleging that: For years, Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 1:24 pm by Zak Gowen
(September 17, 2007), § III.B.1 (discussing potential for referrals across a broad cross-section of medical specialties). [5] FTC Advisory Opinion re: MedSouth, Inc. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:08 pm by Anthony Zaller
Under this bill a “Call Center” is defined as a facility or other operation where employees, as their primary function, receive telephone calls or other electronic communication for the purpose of providing customer service or other related functions. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Liz Cheney Loses Primary While Vowing Effort to Keep Trump from White House MSN – Paul Kane and Hannah Knowles (Washington Post) | Published: 8/16/2022 Rep. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:38 am by Kelly Shivery
Unnecessary Medical Services: there were several settlements involving providers billing the government for medically unnecessary services. [read post]
This would confer protected status based on sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Massachusetts ban, which is the primary U.S. experience to date, has not achieved its goals. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am by Robert Liles
In prior hospice audits examining beneficiary eligibility and medical necessity, the OIG has pulled random samples of claims and sent the associated medical records to an Independent Medical Review Contractor (IMRC) to determine whether the hospice services billed met Medicare’s coverage, medical necessity and coding requirements. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In denying plaintiff's motion, the court determined that a reasonable jury could have concluded that Miller's "mistake and the shooting that resulted" did not violate any applicable standard of care and hinged on a credibility determination best left for the jury (US Dist Ct, ND NY, 3:13 CV 107, Sept. 27, 2017, McAvoy, Sr. [read post]