Search for: "Progressive Industries, Inc. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2017, 7:01 am
Appx. 869 (6th Cir. 2005) (citing AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:22 am by WIMS
EME Homer City[1] and Seventh, United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 9:16 am by Matthew David Brozik
Republished by Blog Post PromoterI can’t write a better introductory sentence than Judge Andrew Carter of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York did to open his May 20, 2013, order and opinion in Blagman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:36 am by WIMS
<> Waste to work: Penn State researchers use industrial waste in hydraulic fracturing - Penn State University researchers say they have discovered how to use industrial waste products to make the controversial practice of fracking more sustainable. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 12:09 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Under the TCPA, it is `unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States -- (A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone dialing system . . . [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:22 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
” Twenty-two years later, the Ninth Circuit, in Rio Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm by Schachtman
Sanders argues that the Milward opinion is important because it highlights what he characterizes as a “rhetorical conflict that has been ongoing, often below the surface, since the United States Supreme Court’s 1993 opinion in Daubert v. [read post]