Search for: "Pullman v State" Results 21 - 40 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2015, 5:55 am by Patricia Salkin
” Because Defendants had not identified any unclear state laws that are at issue in this case, the Pullman abstention was not warranted. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 5:15 am
On two occasions, I have used Smelt v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We have two topics dominating today’s conversation on LXBN: the Supreme Court ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:06 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Daniel Schwartz chimes in on yesterday's hot topic, Thompson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by John Steele
Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496 (1941)) on the ground that the state laws are unclear as to whether they prohibit non-lawyer ownership of law firms. [read post]