Search for: "R. Polk Wagner" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2011, 11:25 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) National Journal has the story, and Patently O has lots of good stuff for context.Along similar lines, David Abrams and Polk Wagner have just posted an interesting new draft paper on one of the major questions addressed by the patent reform bill: Priority Rules: An Empirical Exploration of First-to-Invent Versus First-to-File. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:28 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Polk Wagner (Penn) [252 downloads] Making Sense of Fair Use, by Neil W. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 10:42 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Polk Wagner's analysis several years ago in Understanding Patent-Quality Mechanisms. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:35 am
Polk Wagner, Professor Melissa Feeney Wasserman, Ms. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:37 pm by Rantanen
  In a recently released draft paper, Lee Petherbridge, Polk Wagner, and I discuss the results of a study in which we empirically examined patents that were determined to be unenforceable due to inequitable conduct and compared them to litigated patents. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:19 am by Ashby Jones
"Morality . . . can't play a role in departing from the statute," argued Davis Polk's Karen Wagner, a lawyer for owner of the New York Mets. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:05 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Rev. 809 (2010)1358Lemley, Mark A.; Risch, Michael; Sichelman, Ted; Wagner, R. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:58 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
(For those unfamiliar with claim construction, see Polk Wagner's introductory lecture.) [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 7:03 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
State, 958 So. 2d 496, 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)); Wagner v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:30 am by Jason Rantanen
Polk Wagner and Lee Petherbridge, Is the Federal Circuit Succeeding? [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:13 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Polk Wagner :At the appellate level, several plaintiffs saw their causes of action evaporate, while others had their rulings against state sovereigns vacated and remanded in light of Florida Prepaid. n119 The first of these [page 1250] cases was Genentech v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:19 am by Dennis Crouch
In particular, as I urged in an amicus brief with Professors Mark Lemley, Michael Risch, and Polk Wagner—Bilski rightly adheres to the 150-year old tradition that as long as the claimed invention is a machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or a process, only natural phenomena, laws of nature, and abstract ideas should be excluded from eligible subject matter. [read post]