Search for: "R. R. D. v. Holder"
Results 21 - 40
of 905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2011, 2:19 am
Swift 1st Ltd v Colin and others [2011] WLR (D) 262 “The holder of a charge over a property had full power of sale under the Law of Property Act 1925 irrespective of the fact that the charge had not been substantially registered. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:32 am
BKURCE R. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:28 am
In George Perez as Trustee v. 222 Sutter St. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 9:23 pm
D. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Holder. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:08 pm
By Kurt R. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:47 am
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure and others; Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08); [2011] WLR (D) 286 “The clauses of an exclusive licence agreement concluded between a holder of intellectual property rights and a broadcaster constituted a restriction on competition prohibited by article 101FEU of the FEU Treaty where they obliged the broadcaster not to supply decoding devices enabling… [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:59 am
In reality patents provide excessive financial rewards to patent holders – a recent WHO report found that for new cancer medicines using the highest R&D cost estimates it took an average of five years for companies to completely recoup risk-adjusted R&D outlays, and the high prices set by companies present significant patient access barriers.Furthermore, pharmaceutical companies frequently seek to extend patent terms beyond… [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:59 am
R. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:02 am
A headline reads: "Faisal Shahzad confesses to Times Square terror plot; admits he trained for 5 months in Pakistan Memo to Attorney General Eric Holder: Re: U.S. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 4:49 pm
Jones, D. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:23 pm
By Kurt R. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 6:25 am
On Monday, the press office of the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Dusseldorf Regional Court) issued a press release on six Conversant v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:23 pm
By Kurt R. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:13 am
See Unwired Planet v Samsung, LG Düsseldorf, 19 January 2016 - Case No. 4b O 120/14. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:24 am
It does not pretend to be associated with the trademark holder. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:56 pm
There is therefore serious concern that settlement unduly delays generic entry, harming consumers and potentially distorting R&D incentives." [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 1:30 pm
IPR holders active in downstream product markets (hereafter, "vertically-integrated firms") may be licensing their technologies to reap additional profits from their R&D expenditures, but also to obtain access to other firms' technologies through cross-licensing agreements. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
For example, Nokia has argued that “[r]equiring component-level licensing contravenes industry norms, leads to the ATIS and TIA IPR Policies being inconsistent with the ETSI IPR Policy, and could have unintended consequences for other SEP holders and the industry at large. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 12:40 am
Here's the tweet (this post continues below the tweet):Hot #FRAND News: Regional Court Düsseldorf refers questions to #CJEU, stays #Nokia's injunction prceedings against #Daimler | #SEP #patent #litigation— Benjamin Rätz (@bjnrtz) November 26, 2020 As a result, a Nokia v. [read post]
