Search for: "RE VIDEOCONFERENCING IN THE DISTRICT COURTS"
Results 21 - 24
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2014, 4:42 am
”Id. at 418 (citing In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 988 [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 2:55 am
As currently written the Federal Rules seem to only permit this Court to subpoena trial testimony -- whether in-person or video -- from non-parties who are within this judicial district or within 100 miles of the Court. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Peters, No. 05-6101 "A sentence imposed on remand for offenses arising out of a tax fraud scheme is reversed and remanded for re-sentencing where the district court's failure to address defendant's "time-served" argument did not satisfy the "procedural reasonableness" requirement required by Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
§ 408(a)(8) The judgment of the District Court sentencing the defendant to 57 months is reversed, and the case is remanded for re-sentencing. 08a0025p.06 American Zurich v. [read post]
