Search for: "RICE v. MCDONALD " Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 15 February 2023, judgment was handed down in McDonald v Goranko, 2023 BCSC 231 (CanLII). [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:06 pm by Michael Grossman
A pair of favored examples are Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants, aka “The Hot Coffee Case,” and Pearson v Chung, or “The Pants Lawsuit. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:12 am by SHG
No cop has been successfully prosecuted in the absence of video, and even with video prosecutions are mostly unsuccessful because Graham v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Two days later, Judge Gibson dismissed proceedings in Zimmerman v Perkiss (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 458. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:00 pm by Kristyn Shea
  If this error occurs, veterans can appeal for an earlier effective date and cite Rice v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 7:31 am
  If this error occurs, veterans can appeal for an earlier effective date and cite Rice v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:56 am by Ion Meyn
At the heart of the rule-resistant narrative is Graham v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
” See Corbett McDonald, “Silica and Lung Cancer: Hazard or Risk,” 44 Ann. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:00 pm
On September 25, 2009, I posted Part 1 of a 4-part series that examines the food safety record of both pasteurized and raw dairy products. [read post]