Search for: "RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE"
Results 21 - 40
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Remember United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 6:28 pm
State, No. 02-16-00195-CR (Tex. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Cancellation recognizes longtime LPRs’ deep ties to the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 2:47 am
Last Tuesday, the Ninth Circuit appeals panel issued its ruling in Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
United States, in Trump v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:21 am
United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am
Department of Defense, Patchak v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
The FactsJane Doe entered the United States unaccompanied, without legal documentation, in early September. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:59 pm
Department of Defense (October 11): Whether challenges to a 2015 rule that defines the term “waters of the United States” for purposes of the Clean Water Act should be filed first in federal district court or a federal court of appeals. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
A foreign defendant who comes to the United States to raise a defense, is in essence imprisoned, though in a large prison, as soon as he steps foot in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm
Defense Secretary James Mattis said that the United States is “not in a position right now,” to forge military ties with Russia, according to ABC News. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Department of Defense, which asks whether challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s definition of the “waters of the United States” must be brought in federal district court or in a federal court of appeals, observing that the “Supreme Court has likely stepped in to resolve this dispute because it is a waste of judicial resources for federal courts of appeals to decide whether WOTUS regulations are lawful if they… [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 7:15 am
Rodriguez cites, among other cases, United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
Calixto-Rodriguez, U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
United States, 15-8629, is a revival, having been to the Court once before. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Henceforth, Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm
León Rodriguez, Director, U.S. [read post]
