Search for: "ROEMER v. ROEMER" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" College X appealed the Supreme Court's ruling but only for the purposed of vindicating itself with respect to that part of the Supreme Court's decision that stated that College X had violated Student B's constitutional rights.The Appellate Division, noting that College X did not challenge Supreme Court's holding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious, concluded College X's appeal sought only to vacate that part of the Supreme Court's decision finding that… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:10 am by Rick Hasen
We hope the Commission is able to begin with the Supreme Court’s definition of Non-Coordinated as “expenditures … made totally independently of the candidate and his campaign” in Buckley v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 3:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Roemer—Reading American Indian Law                       [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Unknown
  The NLRB cited as an example of conduct that is protected:A good example is the Eighth Circuit’s picket-line misconduct decision in Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
Bloomingburg Jewish Education Center v Village of Bloomingburg, 2015 WL 3604300 (SDNY 6/9/2015) The opinion and order can be accessed at: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202729033706/Bloomingburg-Jewish-Education-Center-et-al-Plaintiffs-v-Village-of-Bloomingburg-New-York-et-al-Defendants-14cv7250-KBF Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, RLUIPA Tagged: hasidism and zoning, mikva and zoning, zoning discrimination [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am by admin
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Reuben Clark Law School The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
” Justice Ravita Choudhury then posed a long question premised on Roemer v. [read post]