Search for: "ROEMER v. ROEMER"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2019, 4:00 am
" College X appealed the Supreme Court's ruling but only for the purposed of vindicating itself with respect to that part of the Supreme Court's decision that stated that College X had violated Student B's constitutional rights.The Appellate Division, noting that College X did not challenge Supreme Court's holding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious, concluded College X's appeal sought only to vacate that part of the Supreme Court's decision finding that… [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am
" College X appealed the Supreme Court's ruling but only for the purposed of vindicating itself with respect to that part of the Supreme Court's decision that stated that College X had violated Student B's constitutional rights.The Appellate Division, noting that College X did not challenge Supreme Court's holding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious, concluded College X's appeal sought only to vacate that part of the Supreme Court's decision finding that… [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am
Roemer which held that communications showing a total breakdown of the attorney-client relationship marked the end of continuous representation, even though the order came days later. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:21 am
By Eric Stern On July 19, 2018, the New York Appellate Division, Third Department, ruled in Roemer v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:27 am
(See Aaron v Roemer. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
” Justice Ravita Choudhury then posed a long question premised on Roemer v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:48 am
See, e.g., Roemer v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
Frank V. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
Vera and Shaw v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Young v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:22 pm
Bloomingburg Jewish Education Center v Village of Bloomingburg, 2015 WL 3604300 (SDNY 6/9/2015) The opinion and order can be accessed at: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202729033706/Bloomingburg-Jewish-Education-Center-et-al-Plaintiffs-v-Village-of-Bloomingburg-New-York-et-al-Defendants-14cv7250-KBF Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, RLUIPA Tagged: hasidism and zoning, mikva and zoning, zoning discrimination [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:18 am
In Eu v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am
Roemer, . . . (1991) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:42 am
Supreme Court's recent Windsor decision, as well as its earlier decision in Roemer v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:18 am
In a split decision, the North Carolina Court of Appeals (See Christie v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
In this case, U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:39 pm
Roemer. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:47 am
, Caminetti v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:03 pm
Republicans like Buddy Roemer have been harshly critical. [read post]
