Search for: "Rankin v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Gee “may well signal the future of abortion rights in the United States. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Murray Rankin, stated during the debate on June 16, 2016, The safeguards in the bill reflect many things. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.16 After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Mount Lemmon Fire District v Guido Faced with a budget shortfall, Mount Lemmon Fire District, a political subdivision in Arizona, laid off its two oldest full-time firefighters, John Guido (then 46) and Dennis Rankin (then 54). [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
State and subdivisions of state are subject to ADEA regardless of its number of employees in contrast to a private sector employer where the law applies only to "an industry affecting commerce" having twenty or more employeesMount Lemmon Fire District Petitioner v John Guido, Et Al., Cite as: 586 U. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
State and subdivisions of state are subject to ADEA regardless of its number of employees in contrast to a private sector employer where the law applies only to "an industry affecting commerce" having twenty or more employeesMount Lemmon Fire District Petitioner v John Guido, Et Al., Cite as: 586 U. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm by Deborah Heller
In this case John Guido and Dennis Rankin began working for the Petitioner in 2000 and rose to the position of Captain by 2009. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 7:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
  The case is Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]