Search for: "Rasmussen v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2019, 12:01 pm
Nor was Rasmussen v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:19 pm
Board members were selected to represent EU Member States, EC DGs and agencies, NSC, and industry (notably through BIAC). [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm
Journlaw has been in conversation with two European media law professors: Emeritus Professor Dirk Voorhoof (University of Ghent) and Dr Inger Høedt-Rasmussen (University of Copenhagen). [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing looks at this week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Law meets history - interpreting the van Gend en Loos judgment Morten Rasmussen 7. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro Sasae,… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm
" Br. of Amicus United States 19-20. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am
As the U.K. government prepares itself for the beginning of Brexit negotiations in March 2017, it is becoming increasingly clear that there is no off-ramp—and, for that matter, no brakes on the car. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
Sources: Initial Decision In the Matter of Louis V. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Rasmussen & Assocs. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 7:19 am
Rasmussen v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 10:03 am
From State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 11:30 am
We have not posted for a while—that day job can really get in the way sometimes—so we agreed to tackle the ridiculously long decision in Christiansen v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:10 pm
Therefore lawyers play a key role in ensuring that the courts, whose mission is fundamental in a State based on the rule of law, enjoy public confidence. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:05 pm
Appearances For the plaintiffs: Clive Evatt, Roger Rasmussen and Christopher Dibb instructed by David Leamey. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 12:07 pm
In today’s case (Tambosso v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:29 pm
This event will focus on the OHIM Community trade mark opposition decision in CANAL + v KABLEPLUS of 13 February 2014, where an opponent was put to proof of use of a mark which was not the basis of his opposition. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
Rasmussen. 1998. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:24 am
Rasmussen calls ISIS and Russia the two greatest threats to Western values, including liberty, democracy, and the rule of law. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
In today’s case (Rasmussen v. [read post]