Search for: "Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Doe" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2017, 1:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
Bd. of Curators of Univ. of Missouri, 410 U.S. 667, 671 (1973) (per curiam); Healy v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
On Friday, I wrote about an amicus brief, for me and 54 other antitrust and competition policy scholars, that I wrote in Teladoc v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:18 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD ¶8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 3:26 am by SHG
Regents of Univ. of California, 17 Cal.3d 425, 435 (1976), superseded by statute, Cal. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke, Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD ¶8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD ¶8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” See, e.g., Regents of Univ. ofMinn. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:29 pm by Barry Barnett
Regents of Univ. of Cal., 363 F.3d 398, 401-02 (5th Cir. 2004)). [read post]